Boards Are Ignoring A Critical Risk
- Tara Rethore
- 2 hours ago
- 3 min read
Is your board overlooking one of the most predictable—and preventable—strategic risks it faces?
Boards devote considerable attention to cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, regulatory compliance, financial performance, and geopolitical uncertainty. Yet many continue to underinvest in one of their most fundamental responsibilities: ensuring leadership continuity through effective succession planning.
CEO succession is no longer viewed simply as a human resources initiative. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has long recognized CEO succession as a significant governance and risk management issue, reinforcing that leadership continuity is a key responsibility of the board—not just management. Poor succession planning can expose an organization to unnecessary operational disruption, strategic drift, and diminished stakeholder confidence.
Recent events underscore why this matters. At JPMorgan Chase, one of the world's most closely watched boards has made CEO succession a standing governance priority. They've invested years in developing internal leaders and structuring executive roles to support an orderly transition when the time comes.
Rather than treating succession as a one-time event, the board has approached it as an ongoing process of leadership development, enterprise risk management, and organizational resilience.
This level of board oversight remains the exception rather than the rule.
When I speak with directors and executives, succession planning is often discussed only in the context of replacing the CEO after an announced retirement. Far less attention is given to the broader leadership pipeline that sustains the organization if a key executive unexpectedly departs—or if the organization's future strategy demands capabilities it does not yet possess.
That perspective overlooks one of the board's most important governance responsibilities. Succession planning is not simply about replacing leaders. It is about ensuring the organization has the talent, capabilities, and leadership continuity necessary to execute strategy, manage enterprise risk, and remain resilient through change.
Succession plans mitigate the impact.
A good succession plan mitigates the impact of unplanned departures. Yet planning for succession is not just about managing through a crisis. It should be a key part of an organization's talent strategy, CEO succession planning, and broader enterprise risk management process—one that boards review and update regularly.
The most effective succession plans maintain direct links to vision and strategic priorities. They inform leadership development, strengthen the organization's leadership pipeline, and become a roadmap for building the capabilities the organization will need tomorrow—not simply replacing the leaders it has today.
Boards must assure the sustainability of the organization.
A good succession plan helps. While the board's explicit responsibility usually includes only the CEO (or Executive Director), it is in the company's best interest for the board to look beyond the C-suite. Meaningful succession planning assures a ready supply of talent to take on critical roles wherever they reside. It also strengthens organizational resilience, supports effective board governance, and reduces talent risk before it becomes a strategic disruption.
Board involvement has two important benefits:
Identifies the specialized skills or expertise that, if lost, could be devastating. Not typically found in the C-suite, these capabilities are dispersed throughout the organization at any level. They create distinct advantage for the business and are found in any discipline or function and at any level. The board’s external perspective is extremely helpful for identifying the specialized skills needed for today and the future. Their foresight also encourages both boards and CEOs to take action – and allocate resources – to develop, maintain, or expand those critical capabilities before they are urgently needed.
Enables an effective sequence of succession (rather than a single shift) for which each person must be prepared. Promoting an internal successor triggers a domino effect, creating openings at other levels or in different parts of the organization. When the board actively supports a robust and deep succession planning process and assesses critical capabilities gaps, it helps to mitigate the broader risk of losing capabilities throughout the organization. Furthermore, CEOs benefit from enabling the board’s deeper and more meaningful connection to strategic thinking and what’s happening on the ground – without the board getting mired in operational details.
Planning succession is a highly strategic endeavor – one that strengthens board risk oversight, mitigates enterprise risk, develops future leadership capability, and promotes the long-term sustainability of the organization.
Effective governance begins with thoughtful leadership.
If your board is evaluating leadership succession, board governance, or enterprise risk oversight, I'd welcome the opportunity to continue the conversation.
